Mike wrote:

I'd like to see our critics tell us a) whether this study is science and b) whether this study is any good. If it is not good, what's wrong with it?

If they go silent on us, I'll have a look this weekend.

g arago has gone silent so far. He's usually quite verbose about everything else and now that something related to his field pops up, he seem quite unwilling to comment.

I'd like to see if g arago will answer Mike's question or whether he'll avoid answering.

"The absence of exceptions to the negative correlation between absolute belief in a creator and acceptance of evolution, plus the lack of a significant religious revival in any developing democracy where evolution is popular, cast doubt on the thesis that societies can combine high rates of both religiosity and agreement with evolutionary science."