Telic Thoughts is an independent blog about intelligent design.


Archive for the 'Religion' Category

« Previous Entries

Teens, Suicide, Fatalism, and Religion

Posted in Religion on April 25th, 2008 by MikeGene

Excerpts from:
Unrealistic fatalism in U.S. youth ages 14 to 22: prevalence and characteristics.
Jamieson PE, Romer D.
J Adolesc Health 2008 Feb;42(2):154-60.

Approximately 1 out of every 15 youth interviewed (6.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.9%, 7.5%) responded that they agreed they would not live much past the age of 30.

Fatalistic youth engaged in greater suicidal planning, had more accepting attitudes toward suicide, were less attached to religion, and were more impulsive than other youth.

Youth who were more religious, both in identifying with a religion and attending services, were significantly less likely to be fatalistic, an effect that remained in the model despite controlling for suicide acceptance. In addition to not accepting suicide, religion may also act as a buffer against fatalism because it provides reasons for living that may help to counteract stressors that trigger feelings of hopelessness about the future [30–32].

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Digg
  • Netscape

85 Comments »

Happy Kids

Posted in Religion on March 30th, 2008 by MikeGene

Spirituality — defined as an inner belief system — accounted for eight to 17 per cent of the average child's sense of happiness, the study showed.
By contrast, money, the marital status of parents and the child's gender didn't even register one per cent.
[…..]
"What we found out with kids is they know how wealthy they are. They are well aware of how rich their parents are, but it contributes to less than one per cent of children's happiness," said Holder.
Spirituality could be playing a larger role for several reasons. It produces a sense of hope and meaning and often involves socializing, which is important to a child's happiness.

- HERE

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Digg
  • Netscape

1 Comment »

God and Chance

Posted in Intelligent Design, Evolution, Religion on March 26th, 2008 by MikeGene

TT member Nick (not Matzke) outlined his views as a theistic evolutionist. He summarizes as follows:

I'm content with the label "theistic evolutionist," and I believe that:
a) God is the Creator;
b) the history and process by which God created living things is best explained by modern evolutionary biology, rather than "Intelligent Design" in its various incarnations;
c) that process included events that we (correctly) perceive as chance or the results of natural selection, but
d) those events were nevertheless known to God "before" the creation of the Universe, the universe is sustained by God's will, and nothing happens contrary to his will.

I bring this up because this is very close to my own theological views. I would quibble about (b) because I am not convinced modern evolutionary biology and Intelligent Design are mutually exclusive and keep an eye on ID for reasons I have explained before. But perhaps more interesting is point c). From my experience, many theists seem uncomfortable with chance playing a significant role in history. But I think God works through chance. What say you?

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Digg
  • Netscape

57 Comments »

What Science Does and Does Not Indicate

Posted in Science, Religion, The New Atheists on March 24th, 2008 by Bradford

David Berlinski will conduct a tour of the United States in April to promote his newest book The Devil's Delusion. Berlinski is a talented writer, an imposing intellect and not reluctant to buck the tide of prevailing opinion.

Confident assertions by scientists that… they have demonstrated that God does not exist have nothing to do with science, and even less to do with God's existence.- David Berlinski

Attitudes about Intelligent Design are influenced by how we view science and God and whether our view of one affects our attitude toward the other. New Atheists have weighed in with their opinions. Another perspective from a bright analytical mind not committed to theism or Christianity is a refreshing turn of events.

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Digg
  • Netscape

13 Comments »

David Heddle Reviews Ken Miller's Talk

Posted in Science, Religion on March 22nd, 2008 by MikeGene

Check it out. It's interesting to find that Miller does not consider himself a theistic evolutionist.

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Digg
  • Netscape

15 Comments »

God the Farmer?

Posted in Religion on February 19th, 2008 by Bilbo

Mike Gene has pointed out that the identity of the designer need not be God. However, for theists, if living organisms were designed, the most likely agent is God. Many modern theists have objections to God directly designing organisms. Some see it as "tinkering" and beneath God's dignity. Others think that it means God would be forcing His will on the universe, and contrary to His nature, which allows as much freedom to His creation as possible. And others think the idea of God directly designing organisms is more vulnerable to the philosophical problem of evil than a God who leaves the universe alone. Read the rest of this entry »

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Digg
  • Netscape

25 Comments »

America The Stupid

Posted in Media, Humor, History, School, Evolutionary Psychology, Religion on February 16th, 2008 by Joy

The Books section of the weekend New York Times offers this article:
Dumb and Dumber: Are Americans Hostile to Knowledge?

It begins…

A popular video on YouTube shows Kellie Pickler, the adorable platinum blonde from “American Idol,” appearing on the Fox game show “Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?” during celebrity week. Selected from a third-grade geography curriculum, the $25,000 question asked: “Budapest is the capital of what European country?”

Ms. Pickler threw up both hands and looked at the large blackboard perplexed. “I thought Europe was a country,” she said. Playing it safe, she chose to copy the answer offered by one of the genuine fifth graders: Hungary. “Hungry?” she said, eyes widening in disbelief. “That’s a country? I’ve heard of Turkey. But Hungry? I’ve never heard of it.”

Read the rest of this entry »

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Digg
  • Netscape

23 Comments »

More on Faith and Science

Posted in Science, The Critics, Religion on November 29th, 2007 by Bradford

The Irrationality of Science is a Viewpoint article which comments on the recent op ed piece by Paul Davies. A quote from the Davies article is followed by the author's response. My comments follow that.

Davies:

Science, we are repeatedly told, is the most reliable form of knowledge about the world because it is based on testable hypotheses. Religion, by contrast, is based on faith….In science, a healthy skepticism is a professional necessity, whereas in religion, having belief without evidence is regarded as a virtue.

Viewpoint author:

The last sentence is an irritatingly common misrepresentation of faith. Faith is not believing despite the lack of evidence, faith is believing despite the fact that the evidence falls short of proof. Anyway, Davies is going to argue that science, like religion, is ultimately based on faith:

Read the rest of this entry »

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Digg
  • Netscape

37 Comments »

What They're Saying About Davies' Op-Ed

Posted in Science, Nature of Science, Philosophy, Humor, The Critics, Religion, Fine-tuning on November 27th, 2007 by Joy

Bradford posted about Paul Davies' op-ed in the New York Times on the thread Science and Faith. Which quickly went downhill as our live-in critics decended like vultures to put a quick stop to any real discussion.

The SciBlog community wasn't hampered by such tactics, so came out hot and heavy in defense of their ideology against Davies' observations. Anti-theist PZ Myers insisted that Faith is not a prerequisite for science, but only managed to demonstrate laughable ignorance of the relevant science. My favorite excerpts…

When someone says that life would not exist if the laws of physics were just a little bit different, I have to wonder… how do they know? Just as there are many different combinations of amino acids that can make any particular enzyme, why can't there be many different combinations of physical laws that can yield life?

Read the rest of this entry »

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Digg
  • Netscape

117 Comments »

Science and Faith

Posted in Science, Religion on November 25th, 2007 by Bradford

Paul Davies authored Taking Science on Faith an opinion piece in the New York Times. He asks some questions about laws of physics at the end of this paragraph:

The most refined expression of the rational intelligibility of the cosmos is found in the laws of physics, the fundamental rules on which nature runs. The laws of gravitation and electromagnetism, the laws that regulate the world within the atom, the laws of motion — all are expressed as tidy mathematical relationships. But where do these laws come from? And why do they have the form that they do?

Davies next notes an attitude shift and the dependence of life on a limited range of mathematical values. We live in a universe that accomodates life; a most convenient condition.

Read the rest of this entry »

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Digg
  • Netscape

51 Comments »

« Previous Entries
  • You are currently browsing the archives for the Religion category.

  • Featured Books

    The Volitional Brain by Benjamin Libet

  • The Design Matrix: A Consilience of Clues by Mike Gene


  • Pages

    • About Us
    • Afon
    • bipod
    • Bradford
    • Deuce
    • Guts
    • Joy
    • Krauze
    • macht
    • Mike Gene
    • Steve Petermann
    • Submit Story
  • Categories

    • Animal Rights Extremism (38)
    • Approaches (2)
    • Bioethics (23)
    • Biology (148)
    • Brain (29)
    • Bunny Fright Week (7)
    • Cell (12)
    • Computer Science (3)
    • Convergent Evolution (1)
    • Creationism (46)
    • Design Inferences (19)
    • DNA Repair (2)
    • Engineering (10)
    • Eugenics (21)
    • Evidence (10)
    • Evo-Devo (10)
    • Evolution (227)
    • Evolutionary Psychology (9)
    • Fine-tuning (4)
    • Friday Quote (33)
    • Front-loading (118)
    • Guest Post (10)
    • Hating Mike (1)
    • Henry Rollins Award (3)
    • History (26)
    • Hoax (1)
    • Humor (163)
    • Intelligent Design (466)
    • Irreducible Complexity (16)
    • Just For Fun (12)
    • Media (91)
    • Meeting of Minds (7)
    • Memory Hole (1)
    • Metatalk (29)
    • MikeGenes World (15)
    • Nanotechnology (2)
    • Nature (14)
    • Nature of Science (93)
    • Origin of Life (37)
    • Paul Mirecki (16)
    • Peer Review (11)
    • Philosophy (59)
    • Philosophy of Mind (12)
    • Post-Wedge World (18)
    • Quote Mining (9)
    • Random Stuff (109)
    • Religion (131)
    • Repost (32)
    • Richard Dawkins (85)
    • RNA (5)
    • School (54)
    • Science (135)
    • Shoddy Science (10)
    • Stereotypes (3)
    • The Critics (210)
    • The Debate (290)
    • The Design Matrix (61)
    • The Duck (6)
    • The New Atheists (57)
    • The Rabbit (223)
    • Threatiness (84)
  • blogroll

    • Bilbo's Blog
    • ID and Theology
    • Intelligently Sequenced
    • The Design Matrix
    • The Design Matrix Facebook Group
  • Teleology

    • Akilli Tasarim
    • An Evangelical Dialogue on Evolution
    • ARN Board
    • Darwinian Fundamentalism
    • Dasafiando a Nomenklatura Cientifica
    • Design Inteligente
    • Evolution News & Views
    • Evolution Oriented
    • Evolution und Schöpfung
    • Exiled from Groggs
    • He Lives
    • ICON-RIDS
    • ID the Future
    • ID.plus
    • ISCID EoSaP
    • Michael Behe's Blog
    • Post-Darwinist
    • Real Physics
    • Reality Cheque
    • ResearchID.org
    • Robin Collins
    • Steve Jones
    • TeleoLogic
    • Telic Meme
    • The American Scientific Affiliation
    • The Creation of an Evolutionist
    • Thought Provoker
    • Uncommon Descent
    • withallyourmind.net
    • Wonders For Oyarsa
  • People With Interesting Ideas

    • Albert de Roos
    • Biosemiotics
    • Cell Intelligence
    • Darwin or Design
    • James Shapiro
    • Michael Syvanen
    • Panspermia
    • Paul Davies
  • Evolution

    • Anthropology Weblog
    • Charles Darwin on the web
    • Darwin@home
    • Genetic Code Evolution
    • Stephen Jay Gould Archive
    • The Loom
    • Tree of Life
    • Was Darwin Wrong?
  • Anti-Teleology

    • Center for Naturalism
    • Kenneth Miller
    • NCSE
    • Pharyngula
    • Richard Dawkins
    • Talk Reason
    • Talk.Origins Archive
    • The Brights
    • The Panda's Thumb
    • The Scientific Fundamentalist
  • Archives

    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006
    • December 2005
    • November 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
    • August 2005
    • July 2005
    • June 2005
    • May 2005
    • Meta

      • Register
      • Login

Telic Thoughts is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).