Another alternative cover from a reader in Turkey:
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 18th, 2008 at 10:10 pm and is filed under The Design Matrix.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. The trackback link is: http://telicthoughts.com/darwin-in-the-rabbit-hole/trackback/
"Author Mike Gene infected the religion and science forums for months to promote this book. However, after many attempts by several forum participants to get any information that might bolster his claims (or motivate us to purchase the book) Mike dodged every question. One might guess that those positive Amazon reviews are from the author and his friends."
Here's the infection where I dodge every question from the participants. Enjoy.
Mike: Here's the infection where I dodge every question from the participants. Enjoy.
Enjoy? It's like listening to a dripping faucet. Amazing how critics behave as if they know all the answers and then impute arrogance to their opponents.
I think it is a classic illustration of the how prejudice naturally flows from group-think and an addiction to malicious stereotypes. For example, it is clear Stephen Marley has judged and condemned a book he has never read.
MikeGene: I think it is a classic illustration of the how prejudice naturally flows from group-think and an addiction to malicious stereotypes. For example, it is clear Stephen Marley has judged and condemned a book he has never read.
Nothing of any import was said by those clowns, except, perhaps the infinite regress "argument", which is important only because it may seem important to some initially but it actually isn't. I guess some people think we must be the only beings to ever have acquired foresight. Or that all instances of intelligence preceding us in any regressive chain must have come about the same way we did. Many of those same people seem to be happy to believe all sorts of imaginative things if they are consistent with a-telic materialism.
Not all buzzing flies deserve to be seriously engaged at length. Sometimes you just have to swat them and attend to move important matters.
Well, I made a good-faith effort, but yes, it probably was not the best use of my time. As for infinite regresses, while they may be significant from a metaphysical viewpoint, as the DM demonstrates, it is not an essential component of an investigation.
This seems relevant. Mike could accurately be called slightly less than "moderately confident" in his views, while this bunch of critics seem to accurately fit the "very confident" category.
Isn't it wonderful how science is revealing how unscientific the critics are?
Great. Now that Rock has become my step-grandpappy, he's already ordering my around. One of these days I'm goin' crack! Hey, and while I'm at it, where's my bunny!
March 19th, 2008 at 12:10 am
Playboy bunney???
Here is a book list I found:
http://www.amazon.com/Biggest-...
Comment by Stephen — March 19, 2008 @ 12:10 am
March 19th, 2008 at 7:12 am
Here's the infection where I dodge every question from the participants. Enjoy.
Comment by MikeGene — March 19, 2008 @ 7:12 am
March 19th, 2008 at 7:32 am
Enjoy? It's like listening to a dripping faucet. Amazing how critics behave as if they know all the answers and then impute arrogance to their opponents.
Comment by Bradford — March 19, 2008 @ 7:32 am
March 19th, 2008 at 10:46 am
Darwin as a Playboy Bunny is disturbing on soooo many levels!
Comment by Aagcobb — March 19, 2008 @ 10:46 am
March 19th, 2008 at 3:37 pm
Those people are genuinely stupid. Fear not.
Comment by kornbelt888 — March 19, 2008 @ 3:37 pm
March 19th, 2008 at 5:07 pm
Hi kornbelt888,
I think it is a classic illustration of the how prejudice naturally flows from group-think and an addiction to malicious stereotypes. For example, it is clear Stephen Marley has judged and condemned a book he has never read.
Comment by MikeGene — March 19, 2008 @ 5:07 pm
March 19th, 2008 at 5:42 pm
Nothing of any import was said by those clowns, except, perhaps the infinite regress "argument", which is important only because it may seem important to some initially but it actually isn't.
I guess some people think we must be the only beings to ever have acquired foresight. Or that all instances of intelligence preceding us in any regressive chain must have come about the same way we did. Many of those same people seem to be happy to believe all sorts of imaginative things if they are consistent with a-telic materialism.
Not all buzzing flies deserve to be seriously engaged at length. Sometimes you just have to swat them and attend to move important matters.
Comment by kornbelt888 — March 19, 2008 @ 5:42 pm
March 19th, 2008 at 7:51 pm
Hi kornbelt888,
Well, I made a good-faith effort, but yes, it probably was not the best use of my time. As for infinite regresses, while they may be significant from a metaphysical viewpoint, as the DM demonstrates, it is not an essential component of an investigation.
Comment by MikeGene — March 19, 2008 @ 7:51 pm
March 19th, 2008 at 10:49 pm
This seems relevant. Mike could accurately be called slightly less than "moderately confident" in his views, while this bunch of critics seem to accurately fit the "very confident" category.
Isn't it wonderful how science is revealing how unscientific the critics are?
Comment by chunkdz — March 19, 2008 @ 10:49 pm
March 20th, 2008 at 11:57 am
Pardon the interruption, but whatever happened to that "soft-wired" genome essay Mike Gene promised? Did I miss it?
I like that techno-geek talk, soft-wired and all that.
No pressure. LOL
Comment by Rock — March 20, 2008 @ 11:57 am
March 20th, 2008 at 10:15 pm
Great. Now that Rock has become my step-grandpappy, he's already ordering my around. One of these days I'm goin' crack! Hey, and while I'm at it, where's my bunny!
Comment by MikeGene — March 20, 2008 @ 10:15 pm
March 21st, 2008 at 5:13 pm
Mike, I finally started writing a book review. I think you need to give critics like Marley a little more to go on, if you want them to buy your book.
Comment by Bilbo — March 21, 2008 @ 5:13 pm