<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Decline of the Polymath?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://telicthoughts.com/decline-of-the-polymath/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://telicthoughts.com/decline-of-the-polymath/</link>
	<description>An independent blog about intelligent design</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Exile From Groggs</title>
		<link>http://telicthoughts.com/decline-of-the-polymath/#comment-3396</link>
		<dc:creator>Exile From Groggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 13:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telicthoughts.com/?p=293#comment-3396</guid>
		<description>Part of the issue is the growth of specialist knowledge. It used to be the case that with a year of study you could get to grips with the bulk of a field of knowledge. But now to be recognised with a doctorate, you need to have specialist knowledge in a small sub-field of a section of knowledge - not just physics, but say elasticity within physics.

This is a shame, because there are links between all sorts of fields - and it would be good for (say) specialists in biology to have a better handle on statistics than they often have. And often (say) physicists understand statistics, but don't understand the biology, so assume that (say) evolution has answered a lot of the questions that they don't have answers to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of the issue is the growth of specialist knowledge. It used to be the case that with a year of study you could get to grips with the bulk of a field of knowledge. But now to be recognised with a doctorate, you need to have specialist knowledge in a small sub-field of a section of knowledge - not just physics, but say elasticity within physics.</p>
<p>This is a shame, because there are links between all sorts of fields - and it would be good for (say) specialists in biology to have a better handle on statistics than they often have. And often (say) physicists understand statistics, but don&#039;t understand the biology, so assume that (say) evolution has answered a lot of the questions that they don&#039;t have answers to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
