Francis Collins, You're on Notice
by macht
This entry was posted on Sunday, August 27th, 2006 at 1:32 pm and is filed under Humor, Random Stuff. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. The trackback link is: http://telicthoughts.com/francis-collins-youre-on-notice/trackback/

























August 27th, 2006 at 2:17 pm
LOL. But you forgot "The he-said-she-said media".
Comment by Krauze — August 27, 2006 @ 2:17 pm
August 27th, 2006 at 3:17 pm
Very clever and an example of a picture speaking eloquently.
Comment by Bradford — August 27, 2006 @ 3:17 pm
August 28th, 2006 at 2:18 pm
I've tried to watch this joker several times. He's just not funny. The left seems loves him I guess.
Comment by kornbelt888 — August 28, 2006 @ 2:18 pm
August 28th, 2006 at 2:34 pm
The picture of Colbert is offered with a text generator that you input your "items" to. With different words on the list I've seen it on several blogs over the past day or two, including a couple of 'leftist' sites.
I never thought Andy Kauffman was funny either, and I can't stand the "Git 'er done" rube. Still, if they get paid to be comedians, that's how they're billed.
Comment by Joy — August 28, 2006 @ 2:34 pm
August 28th, 2006 at 2:59 pm
I like Colbet, and I'm not a leftist. In case his political view is the roadblock, you might better be able to enjoy this clip, in which he also rips on liberals.
Comment by Krauze — August 28, 2006 @ 2:59 pm
August 28th, 2006 at 3:09 pm
Collins will be on C-Span next weekend: http://www.booktv.org/feature/...
Comment by todd — August 28, 2006 @ 3:09 pm
August 31st, 2006 at 12:43 pm
I'd like to know what you guys think of Steve Fuller's critique of Collins' book. (His review from New Scientist is reposted on Uncommon Descent).
Comment by ragesoss — August 31, 2006 @ 12:43 pm
August 31st, 2006 at 1:30 pm
ragesoss,
It's difficult for me to say since I haven't read Collins book. It seems (according to Fuller's review) that by "theistic evolutionist" Collins basically means "a religious person who accepts evolution." I don't see that as all that problematic. It seems to be more of a description than a philosophy. I kind of thought that at the end of the review Fuller lumped IDists together regarding their problem with Darwinism.
Comment by macht — August 31, 2006 @ 1:30 pm