Friday quote: Darwin's delay
by KrauzeThis is a bad week for established views. First it was the settled view on dinosaur extinction that got a shake-up, and now the old story that Darwin waited to publish Origin of the Species because of concerns over religious reactions is getting some scrutiny. From Nature (registration required):
Did Darwin delay publishing his theory of evolution by natural selection because he feared an outcry from the establishment? This has been a popular belief, and has been stoked by the fact that although Darwin began formulating the theory in 1837, he did not publish On the Origin of Species until 1859.
Now John van Wyhe, a science historian at the University of Cambridge, UK, says that after a painstaking trawl through the letters, notes and books written by, to or about Darwin, he can rule out the idea once and for all. … To carry out his study, Van Wyhe searched for the word "delay" in primary and secondary sources covering the period in which Darwin was working on Origin of Species. He says Darwin and those who knew him never unambiguously referred to a delay in publishing, or gave any explanation for the 20-year 'gap'. … The historian further argues that in letters to friends, family and colleagues, Darwin continually communicated his belief that species could change, and that this is inconsistent with the notion that he was keeping his heretical ideas secret during this period. He even paid copiers on at least two occasions to produce early drafts of his species theory. By documenting exactly what he was doing during the 'gap years', van Wyhe makes the case that Darwin just didn't get down to writing Origin of Species until he had completed other work in hand, including an eight-year study of barnacles. … But several Darwin scholars are not convinced. [Editor of the Darwin Digital Library of Evolution, David] Kohn and others agree that the way in which cultural and social pressures influenced Darwin's decisions may have been overplayed, particularly in the public arena, with less attention being paid to the involved process of scientific discovery. But the consensus in the field is likely to remain that a multitude of factors underpinned Darwin's delay.

























March 30th, 2007 at 11:05 am
Krauze, is this supposed to suggest mainstream evolution is less likely, or that ID or FLE is more likely? What I am really asking is: So what?
Comment by The Pixie — March 30, 2007 @ 11:05 am
March 30th, 2007 at 12:11 pm
Hi Pixie,
"So what?"
You know, I asked myself the same thing when I first saw it: "It may be good enough for the readers of Nature, but at Telic Thoughts the readers are just that bit more demanding."
Being serious for a moment, my motives for posting this were far less sinister than you suspect. The "Darwin waited to publish because he was afraid of the big bad religious backlash" story is one you often hear in discussions about evolution, and I simply found van Wyhe's findings a refreshing perspective.
Comment by Krauze — March 30, 2007 @ 12:11 pm
March 30th, 2007 at 9:13 pm
Pixie, I can think of a couple of so whats right off the top of my head:
1. There are "histories" out there that get started (who knows how and why) and repeated as fact in order to advance particular viewpoints or make particular points. In this case, the idea that the bad ol' religious pressure kept Darwin's wonderful, enlightening theory from being published to the world even earlier.
2. When subjected to actual research, some of the ideas that we take for granted need revision — and this should be a cautionary note to all.
3. Even things that have been "documented" (in the sense that they are written down and passed along by many authors) may turn out to not have much real substantive "documentation" in the sense of research and analysis behind them.
Comment by Eric Anderson — March 30, 2007 @ 9:13 pm
March 31st, 2007 at 6:08 am
So, Krauze, when you say "This is a bad week for established views" you mean a bad week for the established views on the history of science, rather than for science?
Comment by The Pixie — March 31, 2007 @ 6:08 am