Comments on: Miller's Selective Concern http://telicthoughts.com/millers-selective-concern/ An independent blog about intelligent design Mon, 13 Oct 2008 01:54:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: teleologist http://telicthoughts.com/millers-selective-concern/#comment-1338 teleologist Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:34:36 +0000 http://telicthoughts.com/?p=179#comment-1338 I've discussed this on ARN before <a href="http://www.arn.org/ubb/ultimatebb.php/ubb/get_topic/f/13/t/002228/p/1.html#000000" rel="nofollow">Creationism's Trojan Horse from Darwinists.</a> Here is a quote from Miller: <blockquote> ActionBioscience.org: Can science prove or disprove the existence of a higher being? Miller: No, it can't. The existence of a supreme being simply is not a scientific question. <strong>A supreme being stands outside of nature.</strong> Science is a naturalistic process and can only answer questions about what is inside nature. Beyond that it's a matter of personal belief.</blockquote>Miller is not even able to keep his own story straight. What other naturalistic process does he propose other than RM&NS? Darwinists are the ones who are engaged in market repackagng to make it less offensive and believable. I've discussed this on ARN before Creationism's Trojan Horse from Darwinists. Here is a quote from Miller:
ActionBioscience.org: Can science prove or disprove the existence of a higher being?

Miller: No, it can't. The existence of a supreme being simply is not a scientific question. A supreme being stands outside of nature. Science is a naturalistic process and can only answer questions about what is inside nature. Beyond that it's a matter of personal belief.

Miller is not even able to keep his own story straight. What other naturalistic process does he propose other than RM&NS? Darwinists are the ones who are engaged in market repackagng to make it less offensive and believable.

]]>