Comments on: On Labels and Wells http://telicthoughts.com/on-labels-and-wells/ An independent blog about intelligent design Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:07:29 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: edarrell http://telicthoughts.com/on-labels-and-wells/comment-page-1/#comment-10275 edarrell Sun, 02 Apr 2006 11:02:08 +0000 http://telicthoughts.com/?p=608#comment-10275 No. No.

]]> By: MikeGene http://telicthoughts.com/on-labels-and-wells/comment-page-1/#comment-10147 MikeGene Thu, 30 Mar 2006 02:36:59 +0000 http://telicthoughts.com/?p=608#comment-10147 Ed: <blockquote>Krauze, you miss the point again: I've not blogged on terrorists. Holbling has blogged on intelligent design.</blockquote> And you have blogged obsessively about ID. Is that because you think ID is a greater threat than terrorism? Ed:
Krauze, you miss the point again: I've not blogged on terrorists. Holbling has blogged on intelligent design.

And you have blogged obsessively about ID. Is that because you think ID is a greater threat than terrorism?

]]> By: edarrell http://telicthoughts.com/on-labels-and-wells/comment-page-1/#comment-10136 edarrell Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:21:19 +0000 http://telicthoughts.com/?p=608#comment-10136 Krauze, you miss the point again: I've not blogged on terrorists. Holbling has blogged on intelligent design. How many times can you pretend to miss the point? (You <i>are</i> pretending, right?) Or is missing the point so ingrained in ID methodology that it extends to all arguments? Krauze, you miss the point again: I've not blogged on terrorists. Holbling has blogged on intelligent design.

How many times can you pretend to miss the point? (You are pretending, right?) Or is missing the point so ingrained in ID methodology that it extends to all arguments?

]]> By: Krauze http://telicthoughts.com/on-labels-and-wells/comment-page-1/#comment-10113 Krauze Wed, 29 Mar 2006 10:11:05 +0000 http://telicthoughts.com/?p=608#comment-10113 Only now, almost a week later, does Ed come up with evidence that (under his own criteria) he's not a terrorist. But Ed, where's the "dozen or so posts" in which you criticize the terrorists? Only now, almost a week later, does Ed come up with evidence that (under his own criteria) he's not a terrorist. But Ed, where's the "dozen or so posts" in which you criticize the terrorists?

]]> By: edarrell http://telicthoughts.com/on-labels-and-wells/comment-page-1/#comment-10112 edarrell Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:29:58 +0000 http://telicthoughts.com/?p=608#comment-10112 The flag alone is a "full-throated" denunciation of terrorism. Never let it be said that creationists are not consistent, missing or ignoring evidence in all fields of argument . . . The flag alone is a "full-throated" denunciation of terrorism. Never let it be said that creationists are not consistent, missing or ignoring evidence in all fields of argument . . .

]]> By: Krauze http://telicthoughts.com/on-labels-and-wells/comment-page-1/#comment-10086 Krauze Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:19:09 +0000 http://telicthoughts.com/?p=608#comment-10086 My, my. It looks as if Ed doesn't like the taste of his own medicine. My, my. It looks as if Ed doesn't like the taste of his own medicine.

]]> By: Deuce http://telicthoughts.com/on-labels-and-wells/comment-page-1/#comment-10082 Deuce Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:45:30 +0000 http://telicthoughts.com/?p=608#comment-10082 Hmm, two more posts from Ed, and no full-throated denunciations of terrorism. He says Krauze is on the "other side" but he doesn't <em>specifically</em> say what side that is, so I think it's safe to assume Ed's working for the bad guys! And come to think of it, he hasn't said anything about pedophilia either! Didn't I once hear that Ed is a schoolteacher? We'd better report him <em>before he strikes again</em>! :-o Hmm, two more posts from Ed, and no full-throated denunciations of terrorism. He says Krauze is on the "other side" but he doesn't specifically say what side that is, so I think it's safe to assume Ed's working for the bad guys! And come to think of it, he hasn't said anything about pedophilia either! Didn't I once hear that Ed is a schoolteacher? We'd better report him before he strikes again! :-o

]]> By: edarrell http://telicthoughts.com/on-labels-and-wells/comment-page-1/#comment-10079 edarrell Tue, 28 Mar 2006 09:33:07 +0000 http://telicthoughts.com/?p=608#comment-10079 Krauze, I've taken the oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the U.S. four times. Terrorism? You're on the other side, my friend, when you make such rash, crass remarks. Krauze, I've taken the oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the U.S. four times. Terrorism? You're on the other side, my friend, when you make such rash, crass remarks.

]]> By: edarrell http://telicthoughts.com/on-labels-and-wells/comment-page-1/#comment-10078 edarrell Tue, 28 Mar 2006 09:31:40 +0000 http://telicthoughts.com/?p=608#comment-10078 HH, you could be learning. Reminds me of the old lefty line about Nixon-Agnew: "The majority is not silent, the government is deaf." If you don't want to discuss archaeology, don't post on archaeology. HH, you could be learning.

Reminds me of the old lefty line about Nixon-Agnew: "The majority is not silent, the government is deaf."

If you don't want to discuss archaeology, don't post on archaeology.

]]> By: Krauze http://telicthoughts.com/on-labels-and-wells/comment-page-1/#comment-10075 Krauze Tue, 28 Mar 2006 05:07:27 +0000 http://telicthoughts.com/?p=608#comment-10075 Hi Mike, I agree wholeheartedly. I have no intention of banning Ed, I was just joking about his witch-hunter attitude. And judging from the smiley, I think Deuce was too. Hi Mike,

I agree wholeheartedly. I have no intention of banning Ed, I was just joking about his witch-hunter attitude. And judging from the smiley, I think Deuce was too.

]]>