As you know, since you were so fond of Wesley's Wedge, I informed you that I would apply that wedge to you.

Why is it okay for ID advocates to discuss their religious motivations,

We all know that Ed does not think it is okay for ID advocates to discuss their religious motivations in a science class. Thus, Ed has lied.

and not okay for a distinguished scientist like Wilson to discuss his desire fore better ethics?

Notice that Ed has changed "What's the whole point of all this?" and "the meaning of life" into "better ethics." A second lie.

More bias against science, it looks like to me.

No bias against science. A third lie.

Two sentences and three lies from the guy who sits on his high horse and preaches against lying. Tha gives you a total of six lies over the last few days. Because of his unethical behavior and the stench of hypocrisy, Ed is banned from further participation in this thread.

"Why is it okay for ID advocates to discuss their religious motivations, and not okay for a distinguished scientist like Wilson to discuss his desire fore better ethics?"

Do you know of any public school teachers who use biology classes to talk about their religious motivations? If so, you should forward that information to the ACLU.

More bias against science, it looks like to me.