<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Receptor Tyrosine Kinases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://telicthoughts.com/receptor-tyrosine-kinases-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://telicthoughts.com/receptor-tyrosine-kinases-2/</link>
	<description>An independent blog about intelligent design</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 08:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Insulin and Hydra &#124; The Design Matrix</title>
		<link>http://telicthoughts.com/receptor-tyrosine-kinases-2/#comment-197402</link>
		<dc:creator>Insulin and Hydra &#124; The Design Matrix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 04:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telicthoughts.com/receptor-tyrosine-kinases-2/#comment-197402</guid>
		<description>[...] have also seen that receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) would play important roles in facilitating the evolution of multicellular life. Added to this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have also seen that receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) would play important roles in facilitating the evolution of multicellular life. Added to this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeGene</title>
		<link>http://telicthoughts.com/receptor-tyrosine-kinases-2/#comment-197196</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeGene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telicthoughts.com/receptor-tyrosine-kinases-2/#comment-197196</guid>
		<description>Hi Doug,

No, death receptors are not RTKs.  They are similar in the sense that they cluster upon binding of the ligand, but the intracellular face of the receptor contains death domains instead of tyrosine kinases.  The death domain is a region that attracts and activates proteins (caspases) that will then carry out the orderly execution of the cell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Doug,</p>
<p>No, death receptors are not RTKs.  They are similar in the sense that they cluster upon binding of the ligand, but the intracellular face of the receptor contains death domains instead of tyrosine kinases.  The death domain is a region that attracts and activates proteins (caspases) that will then carry out the orderly execution of the cell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://telicthoughts.com/receptor-tyrosine-kinases-2/#comment-197172</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telicthoughts.com/receptor-tyrosine-kinases-2/#comment-197172</guid>
		<description>Mike,

Hope this isn't off topic.
But are are the death receptors on a cell's surface triggered by a killer T-cell's death ligand also RTK receptors?  Or is that another class of receptors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>Hope this isn&#039;t off topic.<br />
But are are the death receptors on a cell&#039;s surface triggered by a killer T-cell&#039;s death ligand also RTK receptors?  Or is that another class of receptors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Insulin and Hydra - Telic Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://telicthoughts.com/receptor-tyrosine-kinases-2/#comment-197118</link>
		<dc:creator>Insulin and Hydra - Telic Thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telicthoughts.com/receptor-tyrosine-kinases-2/#comment-197118</guid>
		<description>[...] have also seen that receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) would play important roles in facilitating the evolution of multicellular life. Added to this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have also seen that receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) would play important roles in facilitating the evolution of multicellular life. Added to this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bettawrekonize</title>
		<link>http://telicthoughts.com/receptor-tyrosine-kinases-2/#comment-195315</link>
		<dc:creator>Bettawrekonize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telicthoughts.com/receptor-tyrosine-kinases-2/#comment-195315</guid>
		<description>Regarding the alleged "tree of life" I went into detail about the problems with it here

http://forums.christianity.com/m_2387149/mpage_1/tm.htm
http://forums.christianity.com/m_2209111/mpage_1/tm.htm

I go into detail about the problems with this alleged hierarchy with ERV's

http://forums.christianity.com/m_2825724/mpage_1/tm.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the alleged &#034;tree of life&#034; I went into detail about the problems with it here</p>
<p><a href="http://forums.christianity.com/m_2387149/mpage_1/tm.htm" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://forums.christianity.com/m_2387149/mpage_1/tm.htm'>http://forums.christianity.com...</a><br />
<a href="http://forums.christianity.com/m_2209111/mpage_1/tm.htm" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://forums.christianity.com/m_2209111/mpage_1/tm.htm'>http://forums.christianity.com...</a></p>
<p>I go into detail about the problems with this alleged hierarchy with ERV&#039;s</p>
<p><a href="http://forums.christianity.com/m_2825724/mpage_1/tm.htm" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://forums.christianity.com/m_2825724/mpage_1/tm.htm'>http://forums.christianity.com...</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeGene</title>
		<link>http://telicthoughts.com/receptor-tyrosine-kinases-2/#comment-195309</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeGene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telicthoughts.com/receptor-tyrosine-kinases-2/#comment-195309</guid>
		<description>Yes, a very clever way to facilitate adaptation.  As for epi receptors, those are G-protein receptors.  The dual use of G-protein receptors and RTK receptors is another interesting story for another day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, a very clever way to facilitate adaptation.  As for epi receptors, those are G-protein receptors.  The dual use of G-protein receptors and RTK receptors is another interesting story for another day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://telicthoughts.com/receptor-tyrosine-kinases-2/#comment-195267</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telicthoughts.com/receptor-tyrosine-kinases-2/#comment-195267</guid>
		<description>More examples of modularity - allowing something to change via mutation/evolution while not having an effect so far and wide that it disrupts other aspects of the cellular environement.  A clever design principle.

Mike, is the epinephrine receptor also an RTK?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More examples of modularity - allowing something to change via mutation/evolution while not having an effect so far and wide that it disrupts other aspects of the cellular environement.  A clever design principle.</p>
<p>Mike, is the epinephrine receptor also an RTK?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
