Telic Thoughts is an independent blog about intelligent design.


« Trust, Science, and Religion
My Graduation »

Seeing Red, Independently

by MikeGene

Here's the abstract of an old paper that uncovered a nice example of convergent evolution at the molecular scale:

We have isolated and sequenced genes from the blind cave fish, Astyanaxfasciatus, that are homologous to the human red and green visual pigment genes. The data strongly suggest that, like human, these fish have one red-like visual pigment gene and multiple green-like visual pigment genes. By comparing the DNA sequences of the human and fish visual pigment genes and knowing their phylogenetic relationship, one can infer the direction of amino acid substitutions in the red and green visual pigments. The results indicate that the red pigments in human and fish evolved from the green pigment independently by identical amino acid substitutions in only a few key positions.

Yokoyama R, Yokoyama S. 1990. Convergent evolution of the red- and green-like visual pigment genes in fish, Astyanax fasciatus, and human. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 87:9315-8.

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Mixx
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • del.icio.us

This entry was posted on Friday, June 1st, 2007 at 10:56 pm and is filed under Convergent Evolution. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. The trackback link is: http://telicthoughts.com/seeing-red-independently/trackback/

7 Responses to “Seeing Red, Independently”

  1. Joy Says:
    June 1st, 2007 at 11:27 pm

    Mike:

    The results indicate that the red pigments in human and fish evolved from the green pigment independently by identical amino acid substitutions in only a few key positions.

    Ummm… this has already been answered by biologists, Mike. We (as primates) see red so we can distinguish new leaves and ripe fruit better than our color blind brothers. I've cited numerous papers saying this very thing in the many trichromatic vision threads at ARN.

    I doubt that fish evolved identical trichromatic capabilities so they could distinguish new leaves and ripe fruit. Huh.

    Question: Did "red" exist before fish, birds, reptiles and/or primates evolved the sensory apparatus to perceive it? Or did "red" come into existence when life (myriad forms) independently evolved the sensory apparatus to perceive it?

    The answer to that is pertinent, I think.

  2. Comment by Joy — June 1, 2007 @ 11:27 pm

  3. Jehu Says:
    June 2nd, 2007 at 5:11 am

    identical amino acid substitutions

    Wow! How homologous are these genes anyway? Apparenlty the amino acids are the same, how different are the point mutations at the nucleotide level?

  4. Comment by Jehu — June 2, 2007 @ 5:11 am

  5. Raevmo Says:
    June 2nd, 2007 at 5:55 am

    From a recent study:

    The results of this extensive study were published in March 2007 in the international journal Ecology Letters (Volume 10, pp. 290-298). In clear ocean waters, blue and green wavelengths penetrate the deepest. Here, the competition model predicts a competitive advantage for red species. In turbid water, with high concentrations of organic matter, red wavelengths dominate. This favours green species. The model predicts stable coexistence of red and green species in waters of intermediate turbidity, including many coastal waters and a wide variety of lakes. These model predictions match the data. Clear waters are indeed dominated by red species, turbid waters are dominated by green species, and waters of intermediate turbidity are characterized by a colourful mixture of red and green species."

    So yes, "red" existed already.

  6. Comment by Raevmo — June 2, 2007 @ 5:55 am

  7. Joy Says:
    June 2nd, 2007 at 9:15 am

    Raevmo:

    So yes, "red" existed already.

    Of course it did, so it's interesting that life had to 'develop' by means of specified mutations the ability to perceive that which already existed. More interesting that so many widely separated kinds of life ended up developing the exact same means. Almost as if it were predestined, eh?

    I like the "Seeing Red" portion of the title of this post, and note that in Chalmers' description of the nature of qualia he uses the color red - perhaps just a coincidental choice, perhaps a quale new enough in the bank of qualia to resonate in most non-color blind people.

    Next question: Humans use the color red to express a consuming emotional state, which in English is phrased "seeing red." Did proto-people emotionally "see red" before they could physically see red?

  8. Comment by Joy — June 2, 2007 @ 9:15 am

  9. Raevmo Says:
    June 2nd, 2007 at 11:16 am

    Of course it did, so it's interesting that life had to 'develop' by means of specified mutations the ability to perceive that which already existed.

    It would be even more interesting if life developed the ability to perceive that which did not exist.

    More interesting that so many widely separated kinds of life ended up developing the exact same means. Almost as if it were predestined, eh?

    Almost, but not quite.

    Next question: Humans use the color red to express a consuming emotional state, which in English is phrased "seeing red." Did proto-people emotionally "see red" before they could physically see red?

    I doubt it. Might the redness of blood have anything to do with it? Why do bullfighters wave red capes to "enrage" the color-blind bull?

  10. Comment by Raevmo — June 2, 2007 @ 11:16 am

  11. Joy Says:
    June 2nd, 2007 at 11:51 am

    Raevmo:

    It would be even more interesting if life developed the ability to perceive that which did not exist.

    Wow. Then the Evangelists among our atheist brethren should stop trying to assert that people's direct perceptions of spiritual realities is all about that which does not exist.

    I doubt it. Might the redness of blood have anything to do with it? Why do bullfighters wave red capes to "enrage" the color-blind bull?

    If you can't see red, blood isn't red. The red capes are flashy to those of us who can see red. If the bull can't see the color, then it's the movement (and/or the matador's attitude) that enrages him.

  12. Comment by Joy — June 2, 2007 @ 11:51 am

  13. Rock Says:
    May 24th, 2008 at 3:41 pm

    Conant & Wagner assert (w/o argument) that convergent evolution is a potent indicator of optimal design. I thought that convergent design is a potent indicator of optimal evolution. Mike Gene?

    http://www.bioc.uzh.ch/wagner/...

  14. Comment by Rock — May 24, 2008 @ 3:41 pm

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Featured Books


    The Design Matrix: A Consilience of Clues by Mike Gene
    Your Inner Fish: A Journey into the 3.5-Billion-Year History of the Human Body

    Catalyzing Inquiry at the Interface of Computing and Biology

    System Modeling in Cellular Biology: From Concepts to Nuts and Bolts

    The Plausibility of Life By Marc W. Kirschner and John C. Gerhart

    Agents Under Fire by Angus Menuge

    Life's Solution by Simon Conway Morris

    Information Theory, Evolution and the Origin of Life by Hubert P. Yockey

    The Fifth Miracle by Paul Davies

    Nature, Design, and Science by Del Ratzsch

    Origination of Organismal Form by Muller & Newman

    Biased Embryos and Evolution by Wallace Arthur

    Rare Earth by Peter Ward and Donald Brownlee

    The Privileged Planet by Guillermo Gonzalez and Jay Richards

    The Way of the Cell by Franklin Harold

    The Volitional Brain by Benjamin Libet

    Evolution in Four Dimensions by Eva Jablonka & Marion Lamb

    The Evolution-Creation Struggle by Michael Ruse




Telic Thoughts is proudly powered by WordPress
Hosting provided by College Crunch.

Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).