South Park takes on God and evolution, part 2
by KrauzeThe continuation of last week's South Park episode on God and evolution has been posted at AllAboutSP. Viewer discretion is advised: There is lots of swear words and a disturbing sex scene (involving Richard Dawkins, no less).

























November 10th, 2006 at 7:20 pm
Hah! I was right when I originally noted, "As for the reasonable Dawkins, perhaps the message is that while the original Crusaders may sound (and even be) reasonable, their extremist message typically recruits disciples that abandon such a reasonable position (Ms. Garrison)."
There are two great LOL scenes: Eric fighting with himself and we get to find out the cause of the Atheist Wars!
Comment by MikeGene — November 10, 2006 @ 7:20 pm
November 10th, 2006 at 8:56 pm
[...] South Park takes on God and evolution, part 2 The continuation of last week's South Park episode on God and evolution has been posted at AllAboutSP. Viewer discretion is advised: There is lots of swear words and a disturbing sex scene (involving Richard Dawkins, no less). [...]
Pingback by Darwiniana » South Park, part II — November 10, 2006 @ 8:56 pm
November 10th, 2006 at 9:48 pm
My favorite line: "Kill the wise one!" That, or "Science H. Logic!"
Comment by macht — November 10, 2006 @ 9:48 pm
November 11th, 2006 at 2:42 pm
Here are some more lines that should resonate with Dawkins and his followers:
You're right! It's so simple! God is a sphaghetti monster!
The Unified Atheist League
What in Science's name was that?!
The United Atheist Alliance
Oh Science help us!
Science damn you!
Allied Atheist Allegiance
Science be praised.
Our Science is great.
You have to be a Dick to everyone who doesn't think like you.
Hail Science!
The Great Dawkins said we cannot tolerate those who don't use Reason!
May Science give us the courage to do what we must.
Comment by MikeGene — November 11, 2006 @ 2:42 pm
November 11th, 2006 at 5:37 pm
"They go around chopping down trees for tables when they have perfectly good tummies to eat on. How logical is that?"
Comment by macht — November 11, 2006 @ 5:37 pm