Comments on: Stickin' with ID http://telicthoughts.com/stickin-with-id/ An independent blog about intelligent design Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:16:15 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: MikeGene http://telicthoughts.com/stickin-with-id/#comment-46285 MikeGene Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:12:57 +0000 http://telicthoughts.com/?p=1064#comment-46285 Hi johnnyb, Perhaps I should have worded my blog better "“ "Hey Mike, since your views about Intelligent Design are so different from <em>the perception</em> of mainstream ID,"¦.." I don't think many perceive mainstream ID to be <em>the same</em> as the views I articulate. After all, this it what many critics have told me. Hi johnnyb,

Perhaps I should have worded my blog better "“

"Hey Mike, since your views about Intelligent Design are so different from the perception of mainstream ID,"¦.."

I don't think many perceive mainstream ID to be the same as the views I articulate. After all, this it what many critics have told me.

]]> By: johnnyb http://telicthoughts.com/stickin-with-id/#comment-46056 johnnyb Sat, 25 Nov 2006 20:39:32 +0000 http://telicthoughts.com/?p=1064#comment-46056 In what ways are your views different than mainstream ID? Given that Dembski has given you a giant thumbs up, and your site is one of the top ID sites, I would find that as good evidence that this _is_ mainstream ID (though, as you've pointed out, not the IDM). In what ways are your views different than mainstream ID? Given that Dembski has given you a giant thumbs up, and your site is one of the top ID sites, I would find that as good evidence that this _is_ mainstream ID (though, as you've pointed out, not the IDM).

]]> By: Darwiniana » Lineage of ID terms http://telicthoughts.com/stickin-with-id/#comment-45899 Darwiniana » Lineage of ID terms Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:02:13 +0000 http://telicthoughts.com/?p=1064#comment-45899 [...] Changing terminology Because there is no rigorous theory of ID, there is a good degree of plasticity associated with the concept. I view, and have always viewed, Intelligent Design as a part of a larger teleological viewpoint that extends back to the Ancient Greeks. [...] [...] Changing terminology Because there is no rigorous theory of ID, there is a good degree of plasticity associated with the concept. I view, and have always viewed, Intelligent Design as a part of a larger teleological viewpoint that extends back to the Ancient Greeks. [...]

]]>