What do they have in common?
OK, OK. Doubters of both official stories are called unscientific and squeezed out of the debate and out of the media.
Any other similarities? Otherwise, I fail to understand why so many threads are devoted to it.
Some may accuse me of doing the same thing with 9/11. But at least I had another angle: both 9/11 truthers and ID proponents try to base their design detection on physical evidence. Even Michael Shermer likened 9/11 truthers to creationists.
But I agreed to not bring it up anymore, since no one else thought it was topical. And since then, the only time I mentioned it was in one of Bradford's open threads that he used as a political tirade.
If I can abstain from 9/11 truth threads, couldn't the others abstain from global warming threads?
Besides, those who want to vent about this have another ID forum they can go to: Uncommondescent.com