<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What a nice, fluffy cloud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://telicthoughts.com/what-a-nice-fluffy-cloud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://telicthoughts.com/what-a-nice-fluffy-cloud/</link>
	<description>An independent blog about intelligent design</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 01:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: g arago</title>
		<link>http://telicthoughts.com/what-a-nice-fluffy-cloud/#comment-19532</link>
		<dc:creator>g arago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 22:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telicthoughts.com/?p=728#comment-19532</guid>
		<description>P.S. Mung, how about 'human selection' instead of 'natural selection' - that is, unless there are web bots doing 'artificial selection' that sends messages - click! :grin:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. Mung, how about &#039;human selection&#039; instead of &#039;natural selection&#039; - that is, unless there are web bots doing &#039;artificial selection&#039; that sends messages - click! <img src='http://telicthoughts.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':grin:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g arago</title>
		<link>http://telicthoughts.com/what-a-nice-fluffy-cloud/#comment-19531</link>
		<dc:creator>g arago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 22:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telicthoughts.com/?p=728#comment-19531</guid>
		<description>Thanks for correcting my oversight, Krauze. It looks like there's been a category 'Religion' at TT's since May 2006. If possible, 'Theology' might be a good addition also, though it might get less traffic from IDists than TE's or EC's (evolutionary creationists). Theology might also help MG explain the 'origins' of the rabbit-fixation.

&lt;strong&gt;TT's Signpost:&lt;/strong&gt; 
Religion (7) 
Intelligent Design (257)
Nature of Science (59) 
Science (48)
Design Inferences (2)
Origin of Life (11)
Irreducible Complexity (6)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for correcting my oversight, Krauze. It looks like there&#039;s been a category &#039;Religion&#039; at TT&#039;s since May 2006. If possible, &#039;Theology&#039; might be a good addition also, though it might get less traffic from IDists than TE&#039;s or EC&#039;s (evolutionary creationists). Theology might also help MG explain the &#039;origins&#039; of the rabbit-fixation.</p>
<p><strong>TT&#039;s Signpost:</strong><br />
Religion (7)<br />
Intelligent Design (257)<br />
Nature of Science (59)<br />
Science (48)<br />
Design Inferences (2)<br />
Origin of Life (11)<br />
Irreducible Complexity (6)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mung</title>
		<link>http://telicthoughts.com/what-a-nice-fluffy-cloud/#comment-19515</link>
		<dc:creator>Mung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 19:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telicthoughts.com/?p=728#comment-19515</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; Religion (7)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Looks like you guys need a Religion contributor :). Unless, that is, you are leaving the determination of successful categories up to the operation of natural selection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> Religion (7)</p></blockquote>
<p>Looks like you guys need a Religion contributor :). Unless, that is, you are leaving the determination of successful categories up to the operation of natural selection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krauze</title>
		<link>http://telicthoughts.com/what-a-nice-fluffy-cloud/#comment-19496</link>
		<dc:creator>Krauze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 14:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telicthoughts.com/?p=728#comment-19496</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;"When one sees the 'Categories' at TT's and doesn't find anything titled 'Theology' or 'Religion' ... 

Random Stuff (34), &lt;strong&gt;Religion (7)&lt;/strong&gt;, Richard Dawkins (16),"&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#034;When one sees the &#039;Categories&#039; at TT&#039;s and doesn&#039;t find anything titled &#039;Theology&#039; or &#039;Religion&#039; &#8230; </p>
<p>Random Stuff (34), <strong>Religion (7)</strong>, Richard Dawkins (16),&#034;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeGene</title>
		<link>http://telicthoughts.com/what-a-nice-fluffy-cloud/#comment-19494</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeGene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 14:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telicthoughts.com/?p=728#comment-19494</guid>
		<description>&lt;img src="http://starchild.astral.net/spatch/cattown/cat-bunny.jpg" width="160" /&gt;What fixation??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://starchild.astral.net/spatch/cattown/cat-bunny.jpg" width="160" />What fixation??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g arago</title>
		<link>http://telicthoughts.com/what-a-nice-fluffy-cloud/#comment-19486</link>
		<dc:creator>g arago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 13:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telicthoughts.com/?p=728#comment-19486</guid>
		<description>Yes, it certainly is (naturalistic) fluff! :lol:

It seems I missed the origin(s) of the bunny fixation, but showing that HUGE rabit to a German friend brought a rather humourous reaction. :shock: Can't help but think, though, that perhaps Telic Thoughts, at least in terms insisted upon by Mike Gene and Krauze that secular-ID or a-designer ID is an acceptable formulation, is somewhat similar to those who celebrate Easter by paying hommage to a rabbit. 

When one sees the 'Categories' at TT's and doesn't find anything titled 'Theology' or 'Religion' (or even 'Apologetics' or 'Argument from Design') it seems the expression is especially pertinent: &lt;em&gt;What's up Doc?&lt;/em&gt;

Animal Rights Extremism (9) Bioethics (4), Biology (53), Creationism (6), Design Inferences (2), Engineering (4), Evo-Devo (2) Evolution (87), Evolutionary Psychology (2), Friday Quote (3), Front-loading (37), History (3), Humor (59), Intelligent Design (257), Irreducible Complexity (6), Media (50), Meeting of Minds (7), Memory Hole (1), Metatalk (7), Nature of Science (59), Origin of Life (11), Paul Mirecki (2), Peer Review (2), Philosophy (27), Philosophy of Mind (5), Quote Mining (1), Random Stuff (34), Religion (7), Richard Dawkins (16), School (7), Science (48), Shoddy Science (3), The Critics (10), The Debate (233), Threatiness (15)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it certainly is (naturalistic) fluff! <img src='http://telicthoughts.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It seems I missed the origin(s) of the bunny fixation, but showing that HUGE rabit to a German friend brought a rather humourous reaction. <img src='http://telicthoughts.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_eek.gif' alt=':shock:' class='wp-smiley' /> Can&#039;t help but think, though, that perhaps Telic Thoughts, at least in terms insisted upon by Mike Gene and Krauze that secular-ID or a-designer ID is an acceptable formulation, is somewhat similar to those who celebrate Easter by paying hommage to a rabbit. </p>
<p>When one sees the &#039;Categories&#039; at TT&#039;s and doesn&#039;t find anything titled &#039;Theology&#039; or &#039;Religion&#039; (or even &#039;Apologetics&#039; or &#039;Argument from Design&#039;) it seems the expression is especially pertinent: <em>What&#039;s up Doc?</em></p>
<p>Animal Rights Extremism (9) Bioethics (4), Biology (53), Creationism (6), Design Inferences (2), Engineering (4), Evo-Devo (2) Evolution (87), Evolutionary Psychology (2), Friday Quote (3), Front-loading (37), History (3), Humor (59), Intelligent Design (257), Irreducible Complexity (6), Media (50), Meeting of Minds (7), Memory Hole (1), Metatalk (7), Nature of Science (59), Origin of Life (11), Paul Mirecki (2), Peer Review (2), Philosophy (27), Philosophy of Mind (5), Quote Mining (1), Random Stuff (34), Religion (7), Richard Dawkins (16), School (7), Science (48), Shoddy Science (3), The Critics (10), The Debate (233), Threatiness (15)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
