Your prospects
by KrauzeIf you are a science student who suspects intelligent design, here are your prospects:
- As an undergraduate student, you should be flunked.
- Your university must prevent you from taking a PhD, and if they fail at that, they should revoke it.
- If you apply for a job in academia, don't expect to be hired.
- If you start researching intelligent design, other researchers will demand that you be kicked out of the lab.
But apart from that, I don't understand why more scientists aren't looking into this ID stuff.
February 14th, 2007 at 12:29 pm
Problems at the University
As I wrote "Teleology" for ResearchID.org my goal (end for us teleologist who have graduated into informationists-thank you Trevors and Abel) was to make Phd Biologists walking down the hall stop and asked themselves "What have I done?" Hopefully many scientific materialists, those who have illogically adhered to philosophical naturalism, will understand that snowflakes and pieces of quartz come about by laws and not rules. Rules required to create prescriptive information.
Snowflakes and crystaline rocks, ordered structures (read your Thaxton 1986) are the best natural laws can do. Worse yet, universities are putting out two different causes of information–information science profs are saying information requires intelligent causation, yet evolutionary science professors say that information originates from unintelligent (random) causes. One field of science says A always causes I, while another science contends B causes I.
"Scientists seek to discover unchanging principles beneath the changing world–Plato's Parmenidean realm–like the boiling point of Fe." - Eric Peterson
Comment by platolives — February 14, 2007 @ 12:29 pm
February 14th, 2007 at 1:13 pm
This disenfranchisement is precisely why I encourage new members at ResearchID.org to register under a pseudonym.
Comment by Joseph C. Campana — February 14, 2007 @ 1:13 pm