10 Responses to “A Bunny Would Never Do This”

1. Mung Says:
   June 7th, 2007 at 1:59 am

   What does this have to do with intellgent design, lol!?

Comment by Mung — June 7, 2007 @ 1:59 am

2. Salvador T. Cordova Says:
   June 8th, 2007 at 10:13 am

   Oh so sad! She looked like she was crying and in pain. I hope she's ok now. Here is the news report: Kathleen Cochrane's Cat Attack Makes Waves on Youtube and the Net

Comment by Salvador T. Cordova — June 8, 2007 @ 10:13 am

3. geoffrobinson Says:
   June 8th, 2007 at 11:25 pm

   As an owner of some cats (including a calico), I don't think she was supporting the cat enough. It was uncomfortable for the cat.

   But, more importantly, the cat was letting her know.

   I'm completely sure she is well aware of that.

Comment by geoffrobinson — June 8, 2007 @ 11:25 pm

4. Salvador T. Cordova Says:
   June 12th, 2007 at 11:59 am

   Open Thread. YAY! Here is an historical moment in the internet debates between ID proponents and DarwinDefenders.

   We recall that Josh Rosenau called Mike Gene a Wanker. [See I'm such a Wanker]

   Well, Rosenau called me a Richard. [See: Soft tissue found in T-rex fossil]

   Rosenaue wrote:

   Sal, you're being a dick.

   That was in response to me pointing out his errors in algebra, chemistry and basic logic. I pointed out to Joshy boy after he made numerous errors in his analysis of chemical data:

   Not a good idea to be interchanging the equations of Isoleucine with with the Aspartic Acid. Plus your algebra is a little off. I'm tempted to fix it for you, but you've got a couple other bugs to fix first.

   When you figure out "T" is not the same as "t", that Temperature is not the same as time, that aspartic acid is not the same as isoleucine, and when you get your algebra fixed, then this discussion has a chance of being useful.

   Confronted with my brilliant insights, Rosenau could only respond by saying:

   Sal, you're being a dick.

   And that's how a lot of these ID vs. Darwin debates go.

Comment by Salvador T. Cordova — June 12, 2007 @ 11:59 am

5. Thought Provoker Says:
   June 12th, 2007 at 12:27 pm

   Sal, you're being a dick.

   (:twisted:Sorry, I couldn't pass it up, please don't take it personally)

Comment by Thought Provoker — June 12, 2007 @ 12:27 pm

6. William Brookfield Says:
   June 13th, 2007 at 11:36 pm

   If this is an open thread then perhaps I can ask an off topic question? Does anyone know whatever happened to M. Turner (EAM) and Chris Langan (CTMU). I really enjoyed their writings on ARN.

   I suspect that M(ike?) and Chris are non-religious and would perhaps be interested in a coalition of non-religious ID scientist/supporters..

   http://icon-rids.blogspot.com/

   Being non-religious (as far as I can tell) I am thinking they would be unshackled by any limiting religious preconceptions. (and subsequently be in a good position to move ID science forward).

Comment by William Brookfield — June 13, 2007 @ 11:36 pm

7. Bradford Says:
   June 13th, 2007 at 11:45 pm

   Salvador:

   Confronted with my brilliant insights, Rosenau could only respond by saying:

   Sal, you're being a dick.

   First a wanker and now a dick. Do you think this guy might have an unhealthy obsession?

Comment by Bradford — June 13, 2007 @ 11:45 pm

8. onething Says:
   June 14th, 2007 at 2:49 am

   Hello William Brookfield,

   I stopped by your site and I like it! I've got it bookmarked. Thanks for stopping by.

Comment by onething — June 14, 2007 @ 2:49 am

9. Salvador T. Cordova Says:
   June 14th, 2007 at 3:12 am

   It may be possible in principle, with the advent of Solexa technology, to confirm the Geneaology of Japheth and thus a major portion of Christ's geneology which would corroborate either an OEC or YEC scenario.

   Also, Solexa technology would possibly confirm or disconfirm John Sanford's genetic entropy or Walter ReMine's biotic message theories. These are all falsifialbe ID theories.

   When I saw Jason Rosenhouse at the Discovery Institute event today, he confidently (perhaps jokingly asserted) Sanford's theory would break. I'm betting Jason will owe me a beer.

Comment by Salvador T. Cordova — June 14, 2007 @ 3:12 am

10. William Brookfield Says:
    June 15th, 2007 at 12:22 am

    One Thing; June 14th, 2007 at 2:49 am
    I stopped by your site and I like it! I've got it bookmarked. Thanks for stopping by.

    You are welcome One thing. Glad you liked it.

    Check out this latest item .. "Massive Study Shreds (Darwinian) Assumptions…" http://icon-rids.blogspot.com/2007/06/massive-study-shreds-assumptions -about.html

Comment by William Brookfield — June 15, 2007 @ 12:22 am