Since the recent flare up of the Culture Wars theme has set some people on edge, it's time to take a breath and enjoy the scenery.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
 |
| The Design Matrix: A Consilience of Clues by Mike Gene |
 |
| Your Inner Fish: A Journey into the 3.5-Billion-Year History of the Human Body |
 |
| Catalyzing Inquiry at the Interface of Computing and Biology |
 |
| System Modeling in Cellular Biology: From Concepts to Nuts and Bolts |
 |
| The Plausibility of Life By Marc W. Kirschner and John C. Gerhart |
 |
| Agents Under Fire by Angus Menuge |
 |
| Life's Solution by Simon Conway Morris |
 |
| Information Theory, Evolution and the Origin of Life by Hubert P. Yockey |
 |
| The Fifth Miracle by Paul Davies |
 |
| Nature, Design, and Science by Del Ratzsch |
 |
| Origination of Organismal Form by Muller & Newman |
 |
| Biased Embryos and Evolution by Wallace Arthur |
 |
| Rare Earth by Peter Ward and Donald Brownlee |
 |
| The Privileged Planet by Guillermo Gonzalez and Jay Richards |
 |
| The Way of the Cell by Franklin Harold |
 |
| The Volitional Brain by Benjamin Libet |
 |
| Evolution in Four Dimensions by Eva Jablonka & Marion Lamb |
 |
| The Evolution-Creation Struggle by Michael Ruse |
August 25th, 2007 at 2:02 am
I'm on to you, Mike Gene:
http://photofile.ru/photo/fish...
Comment by todd — August 25, 2007 @ 2:02 am
August 25th, 2007 at 10:03 am
Looks to me like that ever so cute kitten is just beginning to contemplate a cat-like act…
Comment by Joy — August 25, 2007 @ 10:03 am
August 25th, 2007 at 10:51 am
Dawkins' hilarious "out" campaign.
http://outcampaign.org/
Comment by dantedanti — August 25, 2007 @ 10:51 am
August 25th, 2007 at 1:06 pm
ROFL.
The sad thing is they actually believe the drivel they spout.
Comment by Jean — August 25, 2007 @ 1:06 pm
August 25th, 2007 at 1:39 pm
Hi Jean,
You wrote…
Why is it "sad"
The sin of pride?
Which is more sad, believing drivel or having faith in drivel?
P.S. So much for MikeGene trying to get people to "Breathe slowly and relax".
Who wants to talk about the subtleties of Kinases or quantum mechanics when there is a religious war to be fought?
The majority rules, not science.
Comment by Thought Provoker — August 25, 2007 @ 1:39 pm
August 25th, 2007 at 6:31 pm
TP,
Please be so kind as to provide us with your research on the concept of faith in Christianity. Please also state why it is drivel. (i may have misinterpreted your comment, if so, i apologize.)
Would you rather have science in charge? personally, i dont want the majority in charge, nor science.
and in concerns with the sad and pride issue….does dawkins provide us with any thing to back the statement that athiests have been at the forefront of rationality and beacons of enlightenment? no, he provides us with a nice piece of propaganda. very sad indeed that he is the posterboy for scientific reason. i also wonder why dawkins, when asked directly about his views toward anti-enlightenment philosophy, has never answered or provided arguements to counter theirs (to my knowledge, and i done looked pretty good). talk about forgeting about critical thinking.
Tp, remember, some of us arent interested in natural science as much as we are of say sociology, critical theory, etc.
Comment by dantedanti — August 25, 2007 @ 6:31 pm
August 25th, 2007 at 6:55 pm
dante:
Yeah, the marketing and profit motive shlock is fairly overwhelming, as well as the borrowings from homosexual reality that is an actual real case of civil rights and demanding they be honored. Nobody feels sorry for Richard Dawkins for being the 'World's Greatest Living Scientist' or the Professor for Public Understanding of Science at Oxford.
Yet… yet… that so-cuddly kitten contemplates a cat-like act…
Comment by Joy — August 25, 2007 @ 6:55 pm